You're viewing sample data — a synthetic team (Sara, Marcus, Priya) 10 weeks into using CodeLedger. Start using CodeLedger on your own repo to see your team's real metrics here.
← Team HealthCockpit · Efficiency
Execution Efficiency
How prompt refinement and context compression reduce waste
Prompt Lift 71%, Waste Avoided 61%, average Time to Remediate 3.8h.
low confidence· 87 eventsInput quality
Prompt Lift
71%
how much the prompt coach improved inputs
Context Compression
30%
how much context was reduced without losing signal
Output quality
Waste Avoided
61%
retries avoided, first-pass success
Clean Admission
90%
entries accepted without redaction
Estimated proxy
Waste avoided is an estimated operational proxy — based on retries avoided, first-pass success, and low rework signals. Not a precise financial metric — use as a directional indicator.
Time to Remediate — cycle time from failure to clean submit
3.8haverage
| Engineer | Avg TTR | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Sara Chen | 0.0h | ↓ below avg |
| 🟡 Marcus Webb | 4.2h | ↑ above avg |
| 🔴 Priya K | 18.5h | ↑ above avg |
Lower is better. This is the metric that answers the #1 EM objection: “does quality gating slow my team down?”
Aggregate signals only — no individual productivity tracking.